Ridiculous Baseball Names of Spring Training
After a long and arduous offseason, the beginning of Cactus and Grapefruit League play has officially ushered in the 2011 season. For prospect junkies like myself, Spring Training is one of the more exciting portions of the MLB season; an opportunity to watch the future of the game alongside future members of the Hall of Fame.
Sometimes, however, there are simply way too many players to follow. In any given Spring Training game you are bound to see a slew of players with completely unfamiliar names, and jersey numbers that edge triple-digits and more appropriate for an NFL lineman or receiver.
But if you were to take a few minutes to scan each team’s respective roster – that’s right, numbers 1 through 99 – you’d naturally assume that many of these players are bound for greatness. Or at least their names would lead you to believe so…
Albert Pujols hitting the market is good for baseball
Last night, on ESPN Radio’s Brian Kenny Show, Brian Kenny posed the following question to Jayson Stark: “Is Albert Pujols hitting the market good for baseball?” Stark, being the baseball purist that he is, was a bit befuddled by the question until ultimately saying yes. I tried to wrap my mind around all of the possible answers to this. The answer I finally found was…yes. Yes, it is a great thing for baseball if Albert Pujols lands on the open market.
If your answer to this question is no than you are probably over the age of 40 and grew up watching guys like George Brett, Brooks Robinson, and Tony Gwynn play for the same team for their entire careers. When looking back at the game, you more than likely reminisce about “the old days”. I have no problems with this – we progressive thinkers need folks like you to keep us grounded every once in a while. Not because being nostalgic is of any benefit, but because you are still a fan of baseball and we all must appreciate one another as fans of the game.
March 8, 2011
|
Posted by Daniel "Dee" Clark










Recent Comments